views 1356

Effects of environmental enrichment in a captive pair Golden Parakeet (Guaruba guarouba, Psittacidae) with abnormal behaviors

Aryanne Clyvia, Angela Bernadette Faggioli, Cynthia Fernandes Cipreste

Abstract


Abnormal behaviors (feather plucking, pacing, etc.) are commonly observed in captive animals. Environmental enrichment techniques have been used to improve animal welfare by promoting the reduction of such behaviors and stimulating the display of typical behaviors. The present study examined the effects of environmental enrichment techniques in a captive pair of the endangered Golden Parakeet (Guaruba guarouba, Psittacidae) which presented feather plucking behavior. Different objects of environmental enrichment were presented to birds between February and July 2008. Behavioral analyses were performed by comparing pre enrichment, enrichment introduction and after enrichment phases. At each phase, a total of 42 hours of behavioral data were collected through the scan method with instantaneous recording at sampling intervals of 30 seconds. The results showed that the behavioral diversity of the parakeets increased (e.g. “social behavior” 14.00 ± 3.01, GL = 2, N = 21, p = 0.19; “locomotion” 25.52 ± 3.14, GL = 2, N = 21, p = 0.01) and feather plucking decreased with the use of enrichment (0.10 ± 0.07, GL = 2, N = 21, p = 0.78). However, abnormal behavior was again observed after removing enrichment objects. Although environmental enrichment did not eliminate completely the display of abnormal behaviors, the introduction of objects had a positive effect on increasing behavioral diversity of the animals and, consequently, improving animal welfare.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrade, A.A. & Azevedo, C.S. 2011. Efeitos do enriquecimento ambiental na diminuição de comportamentos anormais exibidos por papagaios-verdadeiros (Amazona aestiva, Psittacidae) cativos. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, 19(1): 56-62.

Azevedo, C.S. & Faggioli, A.B. 2001. Using sand-boxes to increase the foraging activities of red-winged tinamou at Belo Horizonte Zoo, Brazil. International Zoo News, 48: 496-503.

Bachmann, I.; Audige, L. & Stauffacher, M. 2003. Risk factors associated with behavioural disorders of crib-biting, weaving and box walking in Swiss horses. Equine Veterinary Journal, 35: 158-163.

Baer, J.F. 1998. A veterinary perspective of potential risk factors in environmental enrichment, p. 277-301. In: Shepherdson, D.J.; Mellen, J.D. & Hutchins, M. (eds.). Second Nature, Environmental enrichment for captive animals. Washington and London: Smithsonian Institution.

Bashaw, M.J.; Tarou, L.R.; Maki, T.S. & Maple, T.L. 2001. A survey assessment of variable related to stereotypy in captive giraffe and okapi. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 73: 235-247.

Bayne, K. 2005. Potential for unintended consequences of environmental enrichment for laboratory animals and research results. ILAR Journal, 46 (2): 129-139.

Belmonte, F.J. & Silveira, L.F. 2005. Comportamento reprodutivo e hábitos da ararajuba, Guaruba guarouba, no município de Tailândia, Pará. Ararajuba, 13 (1): 89-93.

Clubb, R. & Vickery, S. 2006. Locomotory stereotypies in carnivores: does pacing stem from hunting, ranging or frustrated escape? p. 58-85. In: Mason, G. & Rushen, J. (eds.). Stereotypic Animal Behaviour. Cambridge, U.K.: CAB International.

Dixon, L.M.; Duncan, I.J H. & Mason, G. 2008. What’s in a peck? Using fixed action pattern morphology to identify the motivational basis of abnormal feather-pecking behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 76: 1035-1042.

Garner, J.P.; Dufour, B.; Gregg, L.E.; Weisker, S.M. & Mench, J.A. 2004. Social and husbandry factors affecting the prevalence and severity of barbering (‘whisker trimming’) by laboratory mice. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 89: 263-282.

Garner, J.P.; Meehan, C.L.; Famula, T.R. & Mench, J.A. 2006. Genetic, environmental, and neighbor effects on the severity of stereotypies and feather picking in orange-winged Amazon parrots (Amazona amazonica): An epidemiological study. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 96: 153-168.

Garner, J.P.; Meehan, C.L. & Mench, J.A. 2003. Stereotypies in caged parrots, schizophrenia and autism: evidence for a common mechanism. Behavioural Brain Research, 145: 125-134.

Gasking, L.A. & Hungerford, L. 2014. Nonmedical factors associated with feather picking in pet psittacine birds. Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery, 28(2): 109-117.

Harlander-Matauschek, A.; Benda, I.; Lavetti, C.; Djukic, M. & Bessei, W. 2007. The relative preferences for wood shavings or feathers in high and low feather pecking birds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 107: 78-87.

IUCN 2014. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.1. www.iucnredlist.org. (access on 26 September 2014).

Jayson, S.L.; Williams, D.L. & Wood, J.L.N. 2014. Prevalence and risk factors of feather plucking in African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus erithacus and Psittacus erithacus timneh) and cockatoos (Cacatua spp.). Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine, 23: 250-257.

Laranjeiras, T.O. & Cohn-Haft, M. 2009. Where is the symbol of Brazilian Ornithology? The geographic distribution of the golden parakeet (Guarouba guarouba- Psittacidae). Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, 17(1): 1-19.

Latham, N.R. & Mason, G.J. 2007. Maternal deprivation and the development of stereotypic behaviour. Animal Behaviour Science, 110: 84-108.

Lumeij, J.T. & Hommers, C.J. 2008. Foraging ‘enrichment’ as treatment for pterotillomania. Applied Animal Science, 111: 85-94.

Martin, P. & Bateson, P. 2007. Measuring behaviour: an introductory guide, ed. 3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mason, A. 1995. Flow play at Edinburgh Zoo. The shape of enrichment, 4 (2): 1-3.

Mason, G.; Clubb, R.; Latham, N. & Vickery, S. 2007. Why and how should we use environmental enrichment to tackle stereotypic behaviour? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102: 163-188.

Meehan, C.L.; Garner, J.P. & Mench, J.A. 2004. Environmental enrichment and development of cage stereotypy in orange-winged amazon parrots (Amazona amazonica). Developmental Psychobiology, 44: 209-218.

Meehan, C.L. & Mench, J.A. 2002. Environmental enrichment affects the fear and exploratory responses to novelty of young Amazon parrots. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 79: 75-88.

Meehan, C.L.; Millam, J.R. & Mench, J.A. 2003. Foraging opportunity and increased physical complexity both prevent and reduce psychogenic feather picking by young Amazon parrots. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 80: 71-85.

Newberry, R.C. & Estevez, I. 1997. A dynamic approach to the study of environmental enrichment and animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 54: 53-57.

RIOZOO – Fundação Jardim Zoológico da cidade do Rio de Janeiro. 1998. Plano de manejo da Ararajuba (Guaruba guarouba). Rio de Janeiro.

Rubinstein, J. & Lightfoot, T. 2012. Feather loss and feather destructive behavior in pet birds. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine, 21: 219-234.

Sandos, A.C. 1999. Bird enrichment taking flight. The shape of enrichment, 8(4): 1-3.

Schaap, D. 2002. Enriching the devil: the Tasmanian devil. The shape of enrichment, 11(1): 1-4.

Sick, H. 1997. Ornitologia Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.

Swaisgood, R.R. & Shepherdson, D.J. 2005. Scientific approaches to enrichment and stereotypies in zoo animals: What’s been done and where should we go next? Zoo Biology, 24: 499-518.

Torrey, S. & Widowski, T.M. 2006. Is belly nosing redirected suckling behaviour? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 101: 288-304.

Ueno, F.Y.C. 2007. Análise da variação individual no grito de alerta da Arara azul-grande Anodorhynchushyacinthinus. Master Degree dissertation. Campinas, SP: Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Artes.

Van Zeeland, Y.R.A.; Spruit, B.M.; Rodenburg, T.B.; Riedstra, B.; van Hierden, Y.M.; Buiitenhuis, B.; Korte, S.M & Lumeij, J.T. 2009. Feather damaging behaviour in parrots: A review with consideration of comparative aspects. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 121: 75-95.

Young, R.J. 2003. Environmental enrichment for captive animals. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.




** The work of the Editor in Chief, Managing Office, Associate Editors, and the Editorial Council of Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia is strictly voluntary, and does not involve the use of any resources and infrastructure other than the personal ones**